From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 27 01:35:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE55516A402; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao106.cox.net (eastrmmtao106.cox.net [68.230.240.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F113213C44C; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070327013523.NXMF13364.eastrmmtao106.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:35:23 -0400 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id fdbM1W00b4iy4EG0000000; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:35:22 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:37:19 -0500 To: "Mark Linimon" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200703270123.l2R1NvPx014922@repoman.freebsd.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200703270123.l2R1NvPx014922@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (Linux) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:22:16 +0000 Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.autotools.mk ports/devel/libtool15 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 01:35:28 -0000 On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 20:23:57 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > linimon 2007-03-27 01:23:57 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > Mk bsd.autotools.mk > devel/libtool15 Makefile > Log: > I do not appreciate the attempt to play politics with the reassignment > of > maintainership of these two files. I insist that further commits be > run > through portmgr@ first. ports@? Why not portmgr@ or back to ade@ in the MAINTAINER? Reduce the confuse of practice for ports@ is unmaintain and is open for anyone to poke it. Cheers, Mezz > Hat: portmgr -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team - FreeBSD Multimedia Hat (ports, not src) http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org http://wiki.freebsd.org/multimedia - multimedia@FreeBSD.org