From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Feb 3 07:08:36 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA20425 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 07:08:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA20404 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 07:08:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA185213418; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 04:16:58 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 04:16:58 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: "Jasper O'Malley" Cc: ONE-MO , Cy Schubert , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/9864: make rblcheck use relay.orbs.org instead of dorkslayers.com In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Jasper O'Malley wrote: > I agree wholeheartedly. I like the RBL, because it blacklists an entire > ISP. But singling out dial-up users because spammers might be running mail > servers off them? That's the height of fucking stupidity. I've got a TON > of clients who run full fledged mail servers for small offices with static > IPs from dialup pools. Amen. If admins want to indulge in this powertrip, so be it. I will back out any change which makes that port do that by default, though. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message