From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar  1 09:52:16 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE67116A420;
	Wed,  1 Mar 2006 09:52:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034CD43D49;
	Wed,  1 Mar 2006 09:52:16 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8481A4DB2;
	Wed,  1 Mar 2006 01:52:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 354FE5347B; Wed,  1 Mar 2006 04:52:15 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 04:52:15 -0500
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
Message-ID: <20060301095215.GC97216@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <1141151381.20664.19.camel@mteterin.us.murex.com>
	<20060228192453.GA84695@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<1141155894.20664.59.camel@mteterin.us.murex.com>
	<20060228195014.GA85269@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<1141156556.20664.66.camel@mteterin.us.murex.com>
	<20060228201124.GA85491@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<1141158688.20664.82.camel@mteterin.us.murex.com>
	<20060228204406.GA86137@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20060301103517.vwzsg3o1icswk008@netchild.homeip.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DBIVS5p969aUjpLe"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20060301103517.vwzsg3o1icswk008@netchild.homeip.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mxe@aldan.algebra.com>, ports@freebsd.org,
	gnome@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: While we discuss libtool (-fpic vs. -fPIC)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 09:52:16 -0000


--DBIVS5p969aUjpLe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:35:17AM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote:
>=20
> >Also, Peter Wemm confirmed for me that -fpic and -fPIC are identical
> >on amd64.
>=20
> So why failed devel/pwlib on amd64 and why was the problem fixed by adding
> -fPIC then?

Because it used neither -fpic nor the identical -fPIC on its shared
libraries :-)

Kris
--DBIVS5p969aUjpLe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEBW7OWry0BWjoQKURAu5OAKDKFQlDSJsLS9P3TCAYzSp/uz908wCg7gi5
XhRxUjOQ6e2COMhfYSGXaEM=
=FxoM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--DBIVS5p969aUjpLe--