Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 20:49:30 +0900 (JST) From: Nakata Maho <chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: nork@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/61932: [repocopy request] ports/lang/ifc -> ports/lang/ifc7 Message-ID: <20040126.204930.846934545.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Resent-Message-ID: <200401261150.i0QBo85b000805@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 61932 >Category: ports >Synopsis: [repocopy request] ports/lang/ifc -> ports/lang/ifc7 >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Jan 26 03:50:08 PST 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Nakata Maho >Release: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT i386 >Organization: private >Environment: System: FreeBSD debussy.private.org 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Fri Dec 12 22:14:13 JST 2003 maho@debussy.private.org:/work/cvsup/current/src/sys/i386/compile/MAHO_DEBUSSY-5-CURRENT i386 >Description: ports/lang/ifc is Intel Fortran Compiler for Linux setuped to produce FreeBSD's native binary. Recently Intel Visual Fortran Compiler 8 is released so ports/lang/ifc should be updated. However, version 8 is not very well tested, and seems to be very unstable. We should be better to have both ifc, namely, version 7 series and versio 8 series. According to the porter's hand book, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/ports.html#AEN1250 for such a case we should do repocopy. please do repocopy ports/lang/ifc -> ports/lang/ifc7 Thanks for your time, maho >How-To-Repeat: N/A >Fix: please see the description >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040126.204930.846934545.chat95>