From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 12 19:08:20 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EF0DC16A4D1; Wed, 12 May 2004 19:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.Stanford.EDU (smtp3.Stanford.EDU [171.67.16.138])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B663043D49; Wed, 12 May 2004 19:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from tedu@stanford.edu)
Received: from elaine22.Stanford.EDU (elaine22.Stanford.EDU [171.64.15.87])
	by smtp3.Stanford.EDU (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4D28HbN012177;
	Wed, 12 May 2004 19:08:17 -0700
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 19:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Unangst <tedu@stanford.edu>
To: Michael Bushkov <bushman@stinger.cc.rsu.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040305114316.K19883@stinger.cc.rsu.ru>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0405121906450.7760-100000@elaine22.Stanford.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: bork@rsu.ru
cc: arch@freebsd.org
cc: os@rsu.ru
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
cc: and@rsu.ru
Subject: Re: IPC nsswitch implementation
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 02:08:20 -0000

On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Michael Bushkov wrote:

> Some time ago there was a discussion concerning in-process vs. IPC
> nsswitch implementation. We agreed that we should develop an example of
> IPC implementation and ask for a discussion. We are glad to present you
> sample implementation of the IPC nsswitch model.

can you release a new version with copyright and license information for
each source file?

has any further work been done since the original release?

--