From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jun 22 22: 3: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9BF37B61B for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 22:02:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com (p10-dn03kiryunisiki.gunma.ocn.ne.jp [210.232.224.139]) by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN/) with ESMTP id OAA28264; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 14:02:53 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3952EEA2.BC2EF0B6@newsguy.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:59:14 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Destabilization due to SMP development References: <12213.961613148@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > Everyone talks about using bitkeeper but none of the people who > recommend it have ever actually tried to use it for anything. > Before such recommendations will bear weight, this needs to > change. :) OCVS? (Or was it OVCS? I can never recall...) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org capo@the.great.underground.bsdconpiracy.org Windows works, for sufficently small values of "works". To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message