From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 6 12:32:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8653816A4CE for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:32:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de [129.217.129.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A07143D1F for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 12:32:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (pc2-105.intern.meitner [10.3.12.105]) by meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0295416758B for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:32:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.8.4] (kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i26KWU3j066693 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:32:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) From: Michael Nottebrock To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:32:26 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200403062012.VAA15078@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> In-Reply-To: <200403062012.VAA15078@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_dVjSApiGTxu4jIh"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200403062132.29846.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: Standard sbc and pcm support in GENERIC kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 20:32:32 -0000 --Boundary-02=_dVjSApiGTxu4jIh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 06 March 2004 21:12, Helge Oldach wrote: > BTW, why not make PNPBIOS on by default in 4-STABLE? Is this a "danger > of breaking things, aka POLA violation" against "prepare for 5.x > upgrade" case? I don't really have experience to support this (I upgraded a 4.4 box to=20 5.0-CURRENT once), but I think upgrading 4.x boxes to 5.x from source is=20 pretty messy anyway, just thinking of all the renamed/moved/removed=20 binaries... but maybe someone has already prepared a script to help cleanin= g=20 a freshly upgrading system? I'd definitely be interested in such a thing. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_dVjSApiGTxu4jIh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBASjVdXhc68WspdLARAnc0AJ9ZNk9/anujas4XDZN2ym1ImWXmTgCgo/cD OfK5UOmJxKkxLBTLKBx8Icg= =qts7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_dVjSApiGTxu4jIh--