From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Sep 24  5:32:54 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F2E5937B401; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 05:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id ED5D143E42; Tue, 24 Sep 2002 05:32:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8OCWknd055701;
	Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:32:47 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g8OCWi3V055700;
	Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:32:45 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache)
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:32:43 +0400
From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>,
	Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Who broke sort(1) ?
Message-ID: <20020924123242.GB55438@nagual.pp.ru>
References: <63403.1032725861@critter.freebsd.dk> <20020922204338.GA4971@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20020923122935.A6108@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020923122935.A6108@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 12:29:35 +1000, Tim Robbins wrote:
> 
> A workaround might be to #undef _POSIX2_VERSION after #include'ing <unistd.h>
> in posixver.c but I don't think that would be correct. It's probably better

Removing compatibility with +pos f.e. they just try to confirm POSIX, 
because +N can be filename.

> to either change all the scripts that use the obsolescent +pos -pos syntax
> to use the new -k syntax or to change _POSIX2_VERSION back to whatever it
> was before. I think the second is more realistic.

I think changing scripts to use -k syntax will be right solution.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message