From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 20 23:55:57 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B1F1B75;
 Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:55:57 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl)
Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0488FC0A;
 Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:55:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Footer: b3NlLm5s
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl
 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits));
 Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:55:54 +0100
Message-ID: <50D3A58A.3020002@ose.nl>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:55:54 +0100
From: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas?
References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org>
 <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com>
 <CAJHU=or2MJ7cNz2p4v+YFcOjgV-2dXrxngTeUCkxU8kOqOoFaQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN6yY1vQPf8NUiq9fqr-qPDYSjON+MhXuQd6bHbQWtCbJ+yyqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <50C8CF77.2040102@FreeBSD.org> <kab3a0$3jk$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <50C975B3.7070701@FreeBSD.org>
 <CACdU+f-BrtCZhDT25yX0pvcFx9OvgyndQSQKXS-7UPYGyvr9VA@mail.gmail.com>
 <50C991F3.3040307@freebsd.org> <50D3A1E3.6090408@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <50D3A1E3.6090408@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:55:57 -0000

On 12/21/12 00:40, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 13/12/2012 08:29, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> (On 'pkg check -Ba' producing 'shared library not found' errors for some
> packages)
>
>> Unfortunately it seems to be a fairly common effect in some large
>> projects. Other packages showing the same symptoms:
>>
>>     thunderbird (yeah -- that one was predictable...)
>>     openjdk6
>>     virtualbox-ose
>>
>> ... and that's just out of what's installed on my desktop: by no means
>> comprehensive.  As far as I can tell from a quick check, openjdk6
>> doesn't rely on setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment.
>>
>> I've raised issue #403 in pkgng Github.
> I've just finished committing fixes for this problem to the master and
> release-1.0 branches in Github.  If anyone is feeling enthusiastic and
> would like to try pulling those sources and confirming that their
> favourite packages no longer generate scads of nasty errors when
> re-analysing shlib dependencies, I'd be grateful.
>
> 	Cheers,
>
> 	Matthew
>
> PS.  If you're running pkg-1.0.3, I recommend you pull down the
> release-1.0 branch for these tests.  While you could upgrade to 1.1.a1
> from master, that involves various local.sqlite DB schema changes which
> will be tedious to unwind should you want to revert to the released
> version.
>

I would like to.
But just getting used to svn and other new things since simple csup and 
friends.
How do I pull it?
I have pkg-1.0.3_1 on a machine building packages for my laptop right now.