Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Oct 1998 20:49:38 +0900 (JST)
From:      Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp>
To:        Love <lha@e.kth.se>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, kom-arla@stacken.kth.se
Subject:   Re: deadfs in FreeBSD 3.0/current ?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95LJ1.1b3.981025202548.1224A-100000@sv01.cet.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <am67d87vg7.fsf@zinfandel.e.kth.se>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Oct 1998, Love wrote:

> > > kern/vfs_subr.c:vclean() does a vp->v_flag |= VXLOCK; and after that
> > > "calls" VOP_LOCK().
> > > 
> > > Now when the filesystem is deadfs (we use it in arla[1]), the call
> > > ends up in miscfs/deadfs/dead_vnops.c:dead_lock() that calls
> > > chkvnlock(). Now chkvnlock() sleeps when VXLOCK is set.
> > > 
> > > Who will wake us up ?
> >
> > The wakeup at the bottom of vclean()?  That code also clears VXLOCK.
> 
> But that is done *after* the tsleep, and therefor that code will *never* be
> reached. Kind of hard to wake yourself up. It will hang in
> miscfs/deadfs/dead_vnops.c(1.24):240 forever.

Umm...  Why are you using deadfs in arla?  I think you're breaking an
invariant if vclean is trying to clean out something that's already dead.
Kinda like a double free.

Regards,


Mike




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95LJ1.1b3.981025202548.1224A-100000>