Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:59:27 +0200
From:      Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r220982 - in head: . sys/amd64/conf sys/arm/conf sys/conf sys/i386/conf sys/ia64/conf sys/mips/conf sys/mips/malta sys/pc98/conf sys/powerpc/conf sys/sparc64/conf sys/sun4v/conf
Message-ID:  <20110426085927.GI2472@garage.freebsd.pl>
In-Reply-To: <4DB68631.7070201@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <67F62848-FAA3-4C46-A95A-DA7C82281898@bsdimp.com> <4DB5B0A9.4030805@FreeBSD.org> <20110426070020.GC2472@garage.freebsd.pl> <4DB6721B.3020600@FreeBSD.org> <20110426073517.GF2472@garage.freebsd.pl> <4DB67939.6080301@FreeBSD.org> <20110426080222.GG2472@garage.freebsd.pl> <4DB67FBE.1050707@FreeBSD.org> <20110426083431.GH2472@garage.freebsd.pl> <4DB68631.7070201@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--G3juXO9GfR42w+sw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:45:37AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> On 26.04.2011 11:34, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:18:06AM +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
> >>What do you think about this:
> >>http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DB54BA9.5050901
> >>? I've found that zpool utility don't likes symbolic links, but
> >>except this and together with fixing hardcoding problem IMHO it
> >>looks not bad.
> >
> >It does look good, indeed.
> >
> >What's the problem with zpool?
>=20
> make_dev_alias() creates symlink to the original device. After that,
> attempt to do `zpool create test /dev/ad12 /dev/ad13` fails. May be
> because it doesn't resolve symlink and can't find geom with name
> ad12.

IIRC zpool go straight to GEOM providers and doesn't even look into
/dev/. Feel free to ignore this issue. Actually I think it is even
better as people will notice that they should not use legacy names.

> >It should operate on GEOM providers only.
>=20
> OK. If `zpool create` is the only possible problem there, then I
> think we can live with it.

I agree.

--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.wheelsystems.com
FreeBSD committer                         http://www.FreeBSD.org
Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!                     http://yomoli.com

--G3juXO9GfR42w+sw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk22iW8ACgkQForvXbEpPzT+pACgmXU9mWJbWuNJikB4baiOn6lY
5RwAoIswFmqHTtCvQlviZ0cG1wDmW93S
=DDCS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--G3juXO9GfR42w+sw--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110426085927.GI2472>