Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:19:52 +0000 From: Mark Valentine <mark@valentine.me.uk> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@queasyweasel.com> Cc: wollman@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's up with /usr/src/usr.bin/alias? Message-ID: <200403030919.i239JqrO024514@dotar.thuvia.org> In-Reply-To: <0613FBAF-6CF3-11D8-9000-000393BB9222@queasyweasel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@queasyweasel.com>
> Date: Wed 3 Mar, 2004
> Subject: Re: What's up with /usr/src/usr.bin/alias?
> Hmmm! That's interesting... We may have something misconfigured in
> the conformance test suite which is causing it to flag these.
On further reading there's additional support for the current behaviour
in the introductory section Command Search and Execution:
"If the command name contains at least one slash, the shell
shall execute the utility in a separate utility environment..."
So it's not as if the implementation has to detect that /usr/bin/cd is
a built-in or anything.
Cheers,
Mark.
--
"Tigers will do ANYTHING for a tuna fish sandwich."
"We're kind of stupid that way." *munch* *munch*
-- <http://www.calvinandhobbes.com>;
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200403030919.i239JqrO024514>