From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 5 04:12:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415B8106566B; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 04:12:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from opti.dougb.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C451623EE; Thu, 5 Jul 2012 04:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4FF513CD.4090308@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 21:10:53 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120624 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brett Glass References: <4FF2E00E.2030502@FreeBSD.org> <86bojxow6x.fsf@ds4.des.no> <201207042156.PAA09080@lariat.net> <4FF4BDA8.50303@FreeBSD.org> <201207050408.WAA11175@lariat.net> In-Reply-To: <201207050408.WAA11175@lariat.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, Robert Simmons , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Pull in upstream before 9.1 code freeze? X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 04:12:32 -0000 On 07/04/2012 21:08, Brett Glass wrote: > At 04:03 PM 7/4/2012, Doug Barton wrote: > >> Other than that, if whoever actually pushes all the rocks uphill to make >> the installer more modular in this regard decides to include djbdns, >> more power to them. :) > > I'm not suggesting that everyone will prefer djb, and the last thing I > want to do is start a religious war regarding the merits of different > resolvers or the efficacy of DNSSEC. I'm merely asking that any change > to the base system or the installation procedure allow me to choose this > or any of the other most popular resolvers, at install time, with as > little pain as possible. And as usual, your patches to implement that feature are eagerly anticipated. -- This .signature sanitized for your protection