From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:55:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998921065675 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:55:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@freebsd.org) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (ZIM.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B478FC0C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q0BHtG4f099555; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:55:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@freebsd.org) Received: (from das@localhost) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.5/8.14.2/Submit) id q0BHtGBt099554; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:55:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:55:16 -0500 From: David Schultz To: Ian Lepore Message-ID: <20120111175516.GA99475@zim.MIT.EDU> References: <20120108183605.GA36775@zim.MIT.EDU> <1326144525.2199.32.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20120111052634.GA96534@zim.MIT.EDU> <20120111101833.GA88428@ci0.org> <1326291254.2419.55.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1326291254.2419.55.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fenv.h fixes for softfloat X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:55:22 -0000 On Wed, Jan 11, 2012, Ian Lepore wrote: > I can probably find time to work with it a bit more, I just wanted to > quickly post the initial results, especially in case the feedback was > along the lines of "thanks, but testing in an 8.2 environment won't > work." We rely pretty heavily on floating point math on ARM at work, so > I may even be able to dedicate some non-hobbyist cycles to it (it occurs > to me that running the whole suite of regression tests now that we've > upgraded from 6.2->8.2 would probably be wise). That would be great. A few of the libm regression tests and libm functions depend on fenv.h working, by the way. But most of the important stuff should work.