From owner-freebsd-security Wed Mar 10 20: 3:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from stage1.thirdage.com (stage1.thirdage.com [204.74.82.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA17415167 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:03:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jal@thirdage.com) Received: from gigi (gigi.thirdage.com [204.74.82.169]) by stage1.thirdage.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id UAA29191; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:02:22 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990310200031.03cd4b20@204.74.82.151> X-Sender: jal@204.74.82.151 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:03:42 -0800 To: ob1k , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG From: Jamie Lawrence Subject: Re: disapointing security architecture In-Reply-To: References: <4.1.19990310191337.03cdced0@204.74.82.151> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 10:23 PM 3/10/99 +0000, ob1k wrote: > > >oh, Im sorry...I thought it was called _FREE_bsd OS, I was aware that the >approach was a WHOAREYOUPAYINGbsd. Thank you. 1) That was a private message. Posting private messages to mailing lists is rude. 2) It is a free OS. That doesn't mean you get to make random demands that other people jump to provide. You want something? Do it or convince someone to do it for you. I suggest you go learn the definition of free in terms of free software and then come back and play. 3) I won't clutter the list with this any further. (The reason I sent it privately in the first place. -j >On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, Jamie Lawrence wrote: > >> At 08:47 PM 3/10/99 +0000, you wrote: >> > >> >Im sorry, but comments like: >> > 3. disappointed about FreeBSD security architecture? Fix it. >> >are such a copout and a really lame way of reasoning. >> >> Not even. Who are you paying to fix it for you? >> >> -j To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message