From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 20 19:10:58 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD67106566C;
	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:10:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from joe@netmusician.org)
Received: from mail.netmusician.org (dorian.netmusician.org [66.244.95.101])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDF68FC1C;
	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:10:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBE3B906;
	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:10:57 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at netmusician.org
Received: from mail.netmusician.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (dorian.netmusician.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10026)
	with ESMTP id ETGHzuY5pcdP; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:10:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from Shakti.local (c-67-176-145-181.hsd1.in.comcast.net
	[67.176.145.181])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.netmusician.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5190B905;
	Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:10:56 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4BCDFC3B.5010600@netmusician.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:10:51 -0400
From: Joe Auty <joe@netmusician.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 1.1.4 (Macintosh/20100408)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org
References: <20100419185300.55218.qmail@joyce.lan>	<4BCCAA33.5040500@FreeBSD.org>
	<4BCCAE5E.2060407@netmusician.org> <4BCCB9EE.9030503@FreeBSD.org>
	<4BCDF7C9.9090303@netmusician.org> <4BCDF94A.2070302@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4BCDF94A.2070302@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Questions about port revision numbers, portsnap, csup
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 19:10:59 -0000

Greg,

After applying the update (which I noticed was available immediately
after my last response to you, sorry about that!), everything is just
peachy now, or at least not causing the segfaults, thanks!

Not to sound unappreciative and purely in the spirit of being
constructive, I'd suggest a little more specificity as far as what a
"break" is on the commit history. This goofy title was created because
it didn't occur to me that the break fix committed on April 12 was only
for compilation. I would suggest specifying whether the break and the
fix is for compiling, or for the software to work properly
post-compilation. This would have saved me a little confusion and time.


Again, you kick ass, in no way do I want this to sound harshly critical,
I hope this can be taken as purely constructive :)

Thanks again for your help with this fix!