From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 31 07:03:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9769D6; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A48F8FC0C; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3DC14E750E; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:03:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at !change-mydomain-variable!.example.com Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lnL2COF4UHAd; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:03:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.106] (5403A6BE.catv.pool.telekom.hu [84.3.166.190]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8273914E750B; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:03:09 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5090CD31.8010201@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:03:13 +0100 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitan Adler Subject: Re: combining docs@ and www@? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FBSD Doc project , www@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:03:20 -0000 Em 31-10-2012 04:49, Eitan Adler escreveu: > Hey all, > > I'd like to propose combining www@ and docs@ into one mailing list Off: it's actually doc@ not docs@, which apparently seems to work. On: I support the idea. Probably it was thought earlier that a www@ list in itself was useful but in practice, it isn't that useful in itself. I also have one mail folder for the two and I use procmail to collect both of them there. Gabor