Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 10:57:52 +0930 (CST) From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: David Xu <bsddiy@163.net> Cc: glenngombert@zdnetonebox.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, Robert Withrow <bwithrow@nortelnetworks.com>, Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Subject: Re: Version of XFree86 in FreeBSD Release 4.4 Message-ID: <XFMail.20010919105752.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <002701c140a4$c5735a10$ef01a8c0@davidwnt>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19-Sep-2001 David Xu wrote: > I'm confused why Open and NetBSD both have XF4 installed, while we can't. > why! Because X4 sucks to configure. (X -configure is neat but still not very friendly) X3 has a nice point and drool interface. X3 also supports more of the hardware out there than X4. --- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20010919105752.doconnor>