From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb 25 18:42:00 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8081065673;
	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 18:42:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tim@kientzle.com)
Received: from monday.kientzle.com (99-115-135-74.uvs.sntcca.sbcglobal.net
	[99.115.135.74])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234548FC08;
	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 18:41:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by monday.kientzle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id q1PIfxqi017541;
	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 18:41:59 GMT (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com)
Received: from [192.168.2.119] (CiscoE3000 [192.168.1.65])
	by kientzle.com with SMTP id 2gnad76bgzqwvnfzzpsvrw2mf2;
	Sat, 25 Feb 2012 18:41:59 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tim@kientzle.com)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120223121647.50ba7c6a@kan.dyndns.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:41:59 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <39D1C607-E186-4819-A562-E51B0366057A@kientzle.com>
References: <20120221182850.GA20768@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<20120221185754.GL55074@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<20120221194259.GA21185@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<4F440E8B.9020306@FreeBSD.org>
	<20120221220053.GA44386@night.db.net>
	<20120221223251.GA23053@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.1202211831220.22739@sea.ntplx.net>
	<5C146DC6-264B-43A9-9234-9E03315F3D33@kientzle.com>
	<20120223121647.50ba7c6a@kan.dyndns.org>
To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257)
Cc: freebsd-current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>,
	freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: rtld or lang/gcc cannot find libgcc_s.so.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 18:42:00 -0000


On Feb 23, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:

> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:11:13 -0800
> Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> If I understand correctly, the libgcc in base is pretty stripped
>> down compared to "regular" libgcc, because most of that
>> stuff is in our libc instead. 
>> 
> 
> You understand it a bit wrong, but your conclusions are correct. libgcc
> in base is not stripped in any way and is supposed to be identical to
> one coming from upstream.

So where is __umodsi3 supposed to be defined for ARM?

In FreeBSD, libgcc refers to it but does not define it.
It's defined in libc.

I stumbled across this trying to link some freestanding
ARM code using the native cross-compilers.  The link
failed if I used -nostdlib because of a handful of symbols
such as this.

Tim