From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 28 22:21:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5455A32A; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:21:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01DD72D71; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r6SMLKot012183; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:21:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r6SMLKoq012180; Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:21:20 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:21:20 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Gabor Kovesdan Subject: Re: Another CSS suggestion: pre-wrap In-Reply-To: <51F59807.4040308@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <51F558D2.1010808@FreeBSD.org> <51F56688.5040900@FreeBSD.org> <51F57011.2000603@FreeBSD.org> <51F57C6E.9050608@FreeBSD.org> <51F59807.4040308@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:21:20 -0600 (MDT) Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 22:21:22 -0000 On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > On 2013.07.29. 0:09, Warren Block wrote: >> On Sun, 28 Jul 2013, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: >> >>> On 2013.07.28. 21:37, Warren Block wrote: >>>> >>>> Line numbering is nice sometimes, although sometimes it's easy to confuse >>>> with content. Syntax highlighting could be useful in places like the >>>> Architecture Handbook, but as you say, we don't have it now. >>>> >>>> Would you agree that using this line wrap now would not prevent switching >>>> to other methods in the future? >> >>> I believe it is possible to make them work together. But using these >>> extensions requires using Saxon as the XSLT processor, which is Java-based >>> and slower than xsltproc. Even if we end up using Java for PDF rendering, >>> it would be better to keep the XHTML build fast and Java-free so that >>> committers can easily test their work. >> >> Do you mean Java is needed to do the linewrap on XHTML, or that it would be >> needed to do line numbers and syntax highlighting? > For the latter two only. Excellent! What do you think about adding it after the doc slush ends in a week or so?