Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Jan 2006 03:28:15 -0800
From:      Jo Rhett <jrhett@svcolo.com>
To:        Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Fast releases demand binary updates.. (Was: Release schedule for	2006)
Message-ID:  <20060106112815.GH54324@svcolo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060105233226.GC17890@soaustin.net>
References:  <43A266E5.3080103@samsco.org> <43AB1E65.2030501@mac.com> <20051222221202.GM39174@svcolo.com> <200512231136.12471.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20060105092448.GH1358@svcolo.com> <20060105184147.GD69162@funkthat.com> <20060105233226.GC17890@soaustin.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I just know that core has either struck it down or been Silent.
 
On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 05:32:26PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> The latter is an entirely different case from the former, and you've been
> claiming core has done the former.  This, and the above, tell me that
> you're not interested in checking your facts before making an accusation.
> (And, as well, that you do not even understand the role the core plays
> in the project.  Hint: it is not primarily technical in nature.)

I agree with most of what you said here.  This was known and understood.
Agreement on direction is what I was expecting, er, dreaming about. Not 
technical issues.  Sorry if that surprises you.  

But I have to take objection to this:

> As a final observation, FreeBSD is rarely advanced by postings of the
> form 'FreeBSD must do XYZ'.  This is primarily because volunteers work on
> whatever they feel interested in doing with their free time, rather than
> the priorities anyone else sets for them.

First, this is obvious and true for all open source projects.  But no,
FreeBSD _never_ advances because someone writes code that does something
well.  FreeBSD _only_ advances when the core developers agree that this
thing is worthy of their interest.

And I'm not even saying this is a bad thing.  It just means that writing
code without buy-in from the core developers is GUARANTEED to be a waste of
time.

-- 
Jo Rhett
senior geek
SVcolo : Silicon Valley Colocation



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060106112815.GH54324>