From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 03:44:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83B416A4CE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:44:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9344A43D1D; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:44:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 52BBE532B; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:44:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 3FC8E5323; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:44:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id C57F833C6A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:44:09 +0100 (CET) To: Antal Rutz References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:44:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> (Antal Rutz's message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:39:03 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: ss X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK, RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61 cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:44:21 -0000 Antal Rutz writes: > I just read the status report of the year 2003 from DragonFlyBSD. > I ask (not only) myself why don't we have something like this monthly or= =20 > bi-monthly. We used to, but it proved to be too hard to get people to actually send in material for the report. There are basically two ways to do this: 1) get committers to submit status reports about the work they have done or are currently doing. Doesn't seem to work. 2) have somebody keep track of everything that happens and write it down. Nobody has volunteered so far (though bmah@ does it to some extent with the release notes) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no