From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 11 12:12:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0AF106564A for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:12:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B786D8FC17 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2BCCWiu018687; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:12:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n2BCCWiS018684; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:12:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:12:32 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: prad In-Reply-To: <20090311012018.2075c3d9@gom.home> Message-ID: References: <20090311012018.2075c3d9@gom.home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: bsd vs gpl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:12:45 -0000 > i've not paid much attention to licensing philosophy i the past, > because for me it was always windoze vs the goodguys. > > however, recently i've become aware of there being a chasm within the > goodguys in that the bsd attitude is do what you want as long as you > give credit to the creator, whereas the gpl folks say do what you want > as long as you keep it free. > > is this a fair summation? not quite. "keep it free" means that you HAVE TO publish sources of your whole product if you will just use a few lines of code from GPL sources. It's not free licence, it's just another kind communism. In contrary BSD licence allows you to JUST USE THE CODE. That's all. Nothing forbids you to write say "prad-OS" that will reuse all drivers from FreeBSD, and sell it commercially in binary only form.