Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 07:50:39 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggested addition to 'date' Message-ID: <94452.1155369039@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 12 Aug 2006 10:44:00 %2B0300." <20060812074400.GA9572@gothmog.pc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20060812074400.GA9572@gothmog.pc>, Giorgos Keramidas writes: >On 2006-08-11 22:53, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> wrote: >This is getting too complex for my taste though. I don't see cat(1) >doing signal trickery, so why should date(1) do these things? > >Perhaps it's not a good idea to 'bloat' date(1) so much... I think I'll second that. The idea is good enough to merit it's own program. Or maybe it belongs in the logger(1) program instead ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?94452.1155369039>