Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:35:06 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/icu and devel/icu2 should CONFLICT? Message-ID: <73F581230344FEF9917F4519@rambutan.pingpong.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0503221719460.50534@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <F8E6FA7DB07FDC436BA3F999@rambutan.pingpong.net> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0503221719460.50534@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On tisdag, mars 22, 2005 17.20.45 +0000 "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > > Hi, > >> I'm pretty certain that devel/icu and devel/icu2 should conflict. Their >> plists are very similar. Any reason not to add CONFLICT to them? > > gtk-gnutella-0.95 should switch to icu (if not already happened) and > icu2 should be deleted? Is that the only package that depends on ICU-2.x? How (in)compatible are ICU-2.x vs. 3.2? Reason I'm poking into this is that java/jikes is severely broken when using the -encoding option, and I was investigation the option of using ICU instead. Jikes' configure script looks for both, but does not recognize icu-3.2 (probably won't accept 2.x either, though).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?73F581230344FEF9917F4519>