From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 24 18:26:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3256637B401; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:26:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EB043F93; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 18:26:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h6P1Q2cJ011912; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:26:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 21:26:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com To: Julian Elischer In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: threads@freebsd.org cc: David Xu cc: marcel@xcllnt.net Subject: Re: KSD/TSD take 2 (was: KSE critical regions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: deischen@freebsd.org List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 01:26:08 -0000 On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > > struct kse_thr_mailbox { > > void *tm_tls[4]; /* reserved for TLS */ > > uint32_t tm_flags; > > uint32_t tm_version; > > struct kse_thr_mailbox *tm_next; > > void *tm_udata; > > uint32_t tm_uticks; > > uint32_t tm_sticks; > > register_t tm_spare[4]; > > siginfo_t tm_syncsig; > > ucontext_t tm_context; > > }; > > looking at the above diagrams, we see: > > struct kse_thr_mailbox need not have any TLS stuff. The offset to the It is only there because you suggested we need a reserve for TLS. It can easily be removed ;-) -- Dan Eischen