From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 15 19:01:48 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA25888 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 19:01:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA25873; Wed, 15 Oct 1997 19:01:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@awfulhak.org) Received: from gate.lan.awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA21271; Thu, 16 Oct 1997 00:53:25 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199710152353.AAA21271@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Brian Somers cc: stesin@gu.net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New PPP? (Re: 8 days until 2.2.5... Administrative notices. In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Oct 1997 23:49:45 BST." <199710152249.XAA18481@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 00:53:25 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk As Jordan pointed out, we don't need any DES problems at this stage :-O Apart from MSChap (and the use of srandomdev() - damn, I really meant to talk to Andrey about merging that), ppp in 2.2 is now the same as ppp in -current. > Oops, one last thing. I haven't merged the MSChap changes into ppp > RELENG_2_2. It's definitely a new feature rather than a bug fix, but > it's non-obtrusive given that you have to enable it. > > Should I merge this Jordan ? Would this hurt release ? > > > > BTW: how about the most modern PPP stuff (by Brian Somers) > > > present in -current? will it be the part of 2.2.5? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Andrew Stesin -- Brian , , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....