From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Nov 25 8:20:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C340C37B435 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 08:20:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id fAPGK1Q65359; Sun, 25 Nov 2001 08:20:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 08:20:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200111251620.fAPGK1Q65359@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Peter Pentchev Subject: Re: bin/32270: ipfw misreads 'skipto' rule number with leading zero Reply-To: Peter Pentchev Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/32270; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev To: Brian Candler Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/32270: ipfw misreads 'skipto' rule number with leading zero Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 18:14:45 +0200 On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 03:56:10PM +0000, Brian Candler wrote: > On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 05:42:21PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > > I cannot reproduce this here: > ... > > Are you running FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE? > > Yes: the laptop I reproduced it on was recently upgraded to 4.4 via the > 'upgrade' process, but the machine where it actually caused the headache was > a freshly- installed 4.4-RELEASE. > > $ ls -l /sbin/ipfw > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 260412 Sep 18 18:27 /sbin/ipfw > $ md5 /sbin/ipfw > MD5 (/sbin/ipfw) = 165f54834431e4437e192ac0c31ef4c3 > > (on both machines) If the /sbin/ipfw files are exactly the same on both machines, then you do not really have a recent -stable. There have been several changes to the ipfw userland code.. and actually, come to think of it, I just found one that would seem to fix your problem: ru 2001/09/24 02:58:47 PDT Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) sbin/ipfw ipfw.c Log: MFC: 1.109: Non-decimal ``skipto'' rule numbers are confusing. This was committed on Sep 24, about two months ago; are you sure that your stable laptop is running a really recent -stable? G'luck, Peter -- If the meanings of 'true' and 'false' were switched, then this sentence wouldn't be false. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message