From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul  8 22:04:39 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD7B16A430;
	Fri,  8 Jul 2005 22:04:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
	[128.131.111.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645A543D45;
	Fri,  8 Jul 2005 22:04:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from [128.131.111.48] (pulcherrima [128.131.111.48])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 01844137AD; Sat,  9 Jul 2005 00:04:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 00:04:31 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <1120859884.91809.13.camel@hood.oook.cz>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0507090003340.14905@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0507082349240.14905@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
	<1120859884.91809.13.camel@hood.oook.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: lang/gcc33: snapshots -> final release
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:04:39 -0000

On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> This looks like decreating PKGVERSION to me, because 3.3.6.20050511 is
> more than 3.3.6. You will have to add PORTEPOCH=1 or something.

This is why I wrote the following above my patch in my original message. 
;-)

>> I've got a proto-patch which looks as follows, but simply removing 
>> PORTREVISION is bad in terms of version comparisons as far as I can
>> see.
>> 
>> Would changing the revision from "20050511" to "release" work?

Would that work?

Gerald