Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:20:59 -0700 From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trouble overriding DSDT Message-ID: <414F81FB.2080309@root.org> In-Reply-To: <37F890616C995246BE76B3E6B2DBE055020AD7F8@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <37F890616C995246BE76B3E6B2DBE055020AD7F8@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Moore, Robert wrote: >>Oh, sorry. Yes, acpidump(8) will always pull the underlying "real" >>table from memory. > > > If acpidump is dumping the "real" tables, why does the DSDT get combined > with the SSDT? Our acpidump dumps all tables that contain AML (DSDT, SSDT) at once. The user load of "which table do I dump?" would otherwise be too great when trying to get debugging info from them. It's hard enough as it is to get both -t and -d output (fixed tables + AML). I'm thinking about making -t automatic when -d is specified. -- Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?414F81FB.2080309>