From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Dec 28 15:51:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from star1.sirius.com (star1.sirius.com [207.44.191.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D878914C8D for ; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 15:51:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eps@star1.sirius.com) Received: (from eps@localhost) by star1.sirius.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) id PAA52724; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 15:51:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 15:51:30 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199912282351.PAA52724@star1.sirius.com> From: eps+ncpo@sirius.com (Eric P. Scott) Subject: editors/nedit vs. net/netcat To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Both ports/packages can be used concurrently, however: + netcat installs an "nc" executable in /usr/local/bin - there is no man page for nc, just a README in /usr/local/share/doc/netcat/ + nedit installs an "nc" executable in /usr/X11R6/bin - nedit provides an "nc" man page * I favor seeing netcat install as "netcat" rather than "nc" (and adjusting the README accordingly). Comments? (Perhaps should offer guidelines on resolving this sort of conflict?) -=EPS=- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message