From owner-freebsd-current Tue Feb 9 10:25:16 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA18460 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 10:25:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from misha.cisco.com (misha.cisco.com [171.69.206.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA18440 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 10:25:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@misha.cisco.com) Received: (from mi@localhost) by misha.cisco.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA10234 for current@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Feb 1999 13:21:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <199902091821.NAA10234@misha.cisco.com> Subject: Re: Which DHCP client In-Reply-To: <199902091755.JAA48633@vashon.polstra.com> from John Polstra at "Feb 9, 1999 09:55:40 am" To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 9 Feb 1999 13:21:07 -0500 (EST) Reply-To: mi@aldan.algebra.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL52 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Wackerbarth wrote: > > > I object to the idea that the selection of which dhcp client is > > being made on the basis that David has commit privledges and I do > > not. > > It's not. It's being made on the basis that David took the initiative > and did the work, and you did not. I think, he did. But his requests to get the thing reviewed/committed went unanswered. This is getting ugly... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message