From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 22 05:49:06 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arm@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D15C106566C
	for <arm@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 05:49:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from ns.kevlo.org (kevlo.org [220.128.136.52])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8E48FC1D
	for <arm@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2008 05:49:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ns.kevlo.org [220.128.136.52])
	by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m8M5LFWA027206;
	Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:21:16 +0800 (CST)
	(envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: ns.kevlo.org: Host ns.kevlo.org [220.128.136.52]
	claimed to be [127.0.0.1]
From: Kevin Lo <kevlo@FreeBSD.org>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080921.202430.-893473872.imp@bsdimp.com>
References: <20080921.202430.-893473872.imp@bsdimp.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:23:23 +0800
Message-Id: <1222061003.10402.4.camel@nsl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: arm@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Code review request
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 05:49:06 -0000

M. Warner Losh wrote:
> I did this a long time ago, but never committed it.  I believe that
> this works.  It uses the common bus space methods to implement the
> default arm bus space methods.
> 
> Comments?

You're missing the bs_ind.h header file and this patch doesn't apply
cleanly against -HEAD. 

> Warner

	Kevin