From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 25 23: 7:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from utility.clubscholarship.com (utility.clubscholarship.com [198.78.70.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F10437B430 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by utility.clubscholarship.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5Q61I723107; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:01:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@utility.clubscholarship.com) Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 23:01:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrick Thomas To: Terry Lambert Cc: Peter Wemm , Alfred Perlstein , Subject: Re: tunings for many httpds... In-Reply-To: <3D190FFA.C7AE70BF@mindspring.com> Message-ID: <20020625225929.U68572-100000@utility.clubscholarship.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Uhh, Terry, neither form of SHM uses KVA. Either pageable or physically > > backed. The memory is only mapped into processes and is NOT mapped into > > KVA anywhere. (*) > > You and Alfred are right. > > It looks like this was corrected by John Dyson, shortly after he > had checked it in to work that way. So the conclusion is that: sysctl kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 Is not even potentially a magic bullet for the issue I am seeing (since either way, all those greatly increased SHM/SEM settings I added are not using KVA) ?? thanks, PT To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message