Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:25:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Gavin Atkinson <gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk> To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Cc: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>, sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sparc64 setPQL2() [Re: cvs commit: www/en/projects/ideas index.sgml] Message-ID: <20061225232254.D11113@ury.york.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20061224235606.GA81999@nimrod.franken.de> References: <200611261205.kAQC5uXq009007@repoman.freebsd.org> <1164559463.44660.3.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <20061127085834.ikvb3hby0ww00w8k@webmail.leidinger.net> <20061224235606.GA81999@nimrod.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 25 Dec 2006, Marius Strobl wrote: > The results are not exactly compelling though I don't mind > committing that setPQL2() implementation. > Gavin, do you have different implementaion or results (better > application...)? The machine I did this on is currently offline, but I'm pretty sure your patch is exactly the same as mine was. I remember not being impressed with the performance change, but I don't remember it being negative (on both an Ultra 5 and a dual CPU E250). When I'm near the box again I'll compare and benchmark the patch with yours. Gavin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061225232254.D11113>