From owner-freebsd-current Wed Apr 22 14:39:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA06721 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 14:39:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dyson.iquest.net (dyson.iquest.net [198.70.144.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA06643 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 21:38:54 GMT (envelope-from toor@dyson.iquest.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA05971; Wed, 22 Apr 1998 16:38:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from toor) From: "John S. Dyson" Message-Id: <199804222138.QAA05971@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: NFS corruption In-Reply-To: <26172.893275966@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at "Apr 22, 98 01:12:46 pm" To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 16:38:05 -0500 (EST) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, ken@plutotech.com, syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Some people may argue that my approach is not correct; but where is > > the alternative code? > > Can you perhaps work specifically with John Dyson and Peter Wemm on > this then? Both have expressed an interest in looking at NFS and I > think you'll find far greater success in working with one or two > "responsible committers" rather than just tossing the ball into > -current only to see it hit the ground while everyone stands around > expecting someone else to run forward and catch it. > Random, diffuse postings to -current don't get my attention, due to my overload. It takes repetition and persistance to deal with me. Think of me working entirely in squeaky wheel mode. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message