From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 24 23:03:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F1F16A42F for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D3843D7C for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:03:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend2.internal (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70678D4C546 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:03:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.152]) by frontend2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:02:59 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: 7QP4S9ApZqjYIjtZfu10yEMBh734+PLx/eYNB8kSZRiG 1145919778 Received: from bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EE8390A for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:02:58 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 00:03:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200604242043.25020.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <200604242050.57732.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <444D3537.3060006@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <444D3537.3060006@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604250003.38751.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: A portupgrade question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 23:03:45 -0000 On Monday 24 April 2006 21:29, Garrett Cooper wrote: > RW wrote: > >On Monday 24 April 2006 12:50, Richard Collyer wrote: > >>On Mon, April 24, 2006 12:16 pm, Ian Moore wrote: > >>>On Monday 24 April 2006 20:43, Ian Moore wrote: > >>>>Hi, I've got a question about portupgrade and something that's happened > >>>>with it a couple of times now. The last 2 times libgda has been > >>>>upgraded, > >>>>I've run portupgrade -a to upgrade a bunch of ports, including libgda. > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >>I always use portupgrade -aR to make sure dependencies are done. However > >>with mysql I find that portupgrade is not the best. > > > > -a, -ra, -Ra and -RrA all do *exactly* the same thing > > Not true. -a is for all, -r is recursive, -R is upper recursive, and -A > is not even valid given the syntax above... Obviously -RrA was a typo for -Rra, but the rest is correct. If you omit -F and include -a, then the -r and -R options are ignored. Hence -a, -ra, -Ra and -Rra are all equivalent. > All I can say is, "RTFM": portupgrade(1). All I can say is "RTFS": /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade.