From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 17 11:17:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA07835 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 11:17:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.netcorps.com (main.netcorps.com [205.149.1.66]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA07823 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 11:17:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by main.netcorps.com (8.7.1/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA07955; Mon, 17 Feb 1997 11:14:43 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199702171914.LAA07955@main.netcorps.com> X-Authentication-Warning: main.netcorps.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: batie@agora.rdrop.com (Alan Batie) cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache Virtual Servers (single IP) In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 17 Feb 1997 10:02:04 PST." Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 11:14:43 -0800 From: Chris Bura Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Are many ISPs doing this? It seems to make sence. Cut's down on ifconfigs, DNS, scarcity of IP addresses. What are the drawbacks? Chris > > I believe there is a way to have this run all on a single IP address, > > instead of using a heap of IP Alias settings. > > > > How is this done? > > You just assign the same IP address to all the names. > > BUT --- it only works with HTTP 1.1 browsers, which admittedly is a large > chunk of them, but not all. The rest will get the default server because > http 1.0 doesn't pass the expected server name along. > > -- > Alan Batie ______ It's not my fault! It's some guy > batie@agora.rdrop.com \ / named "General Protection"! > +1 503 452-0960 \ / --Ratbert > PGP FP: DE 3C 29 17 C0 49 \/ 7A 27 40 A5 3C 37 4A DA 52 B9 > > It is my policy to avoid purchase of any products from companies which > use unrequested email advertisements or telephone solicitation.