From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 7 14:35:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D2416A41F for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:35:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD5443D48 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:35:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 4642 invoked from network); 7 Nov 2005 14:35:14 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Nov 2005 14:35:14 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id BC45A28444; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:35:13 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Charlie McElfresh References: <20051106211756.78895.qmail@web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 07 Nov 2005 09:35:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20051106211756.78895.qmail@web31913.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <441x1s34ri.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: can't install php5-dba port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 14:35:15 -0000 Charlie McElfresh writes: > I'm running php 5.05, apache 2.053, on FreeBSD > 5.4-RELEASE. > > When I try to install the port (from the ports > collection) > > php5-dba > > I get this message: > > ===> php5-dba-5.0.3_2 is marked as broken: Doesn't > work with PHP version : 4 (Doesn't support PHP 4). > > Help appreciated. It doesn't seem to be marked broken in the current version of the port...