From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Sep 28 23:51:22 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA22594
          for ports-outgoing; Sun, 28 Sep 1997 23:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA22587
          for <ports@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Sep 1997 23:51:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id XAA09235; Sun, 28 Sep 1997 23:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
To: jgrosch@superior.mooseriver.com
cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Uh oh.. Time to take another look at the packages collection! 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 28 Sep 1997 23:45:43 PDT."
             <19970928234543.04027@mooseriver.com> 
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 23:51:07 -0700
Message-ID: <9231.875515867@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> CDROM drive. The "New and Improved" (tm) package system will have to be
> able to do package installs in a two step process. That is unless you wish
> to tell our users that they MUST have either a CD changer or 2 CDROM drives
> to use our package system ;-) 

Yeah, that's what I'm worried about. :-(

Unfortunately, I can't immediately think of any easy ways to implement
this.

					Jordan