From owner-freebsd-atm  Thu Dec  9 13: 5:17 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org
Received: from piglet.dstc.edu.au (piglet.dstc.edu.au [130.102.176.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 908D114BFA; Thu,  9 Dec 1999 13:05:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ggm@dstc.edu.au)
Received: from dstc.edu.au (azure.dstc.edu.au [130.102.176.27])
	by piglet.dstc.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA00282;
	Fri, 10 Dec 1999 07:04:54 +1000 (EST)
To: jin@george.lbl.gov
Cc: atm@FreeBSD.ORG, phk@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FORE PCA200 working 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 09 Dec 1999 10:36:28 PST."
             <199912091836.KAA28351@george.lbl.gov> 
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 07:04:48 +1000
Message-ID: <29038.944773488@dstc.edu.au>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@dstc.edu.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-atm@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


I posted a few weeks back asking what is the NEWEST canonically viable
microcode version known to work.

The one recommended in the docs on FreeBSD has a known interaction bug
with some Centillions which can CRASH THE CENTILLION.

Its fun to take down your campus network with one 53 byte icmp packet but
the longer term consequences aren't so nice...

[I know this is orthogonal to the question at hand. I just wanted to do
 a me-too with some side matters.]

cheers	
	-George


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message