From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Sep 18 11:59:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3BC14EE8 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 11:59:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id DAA27334; Sun, 19 Sep 1999 03:59:47 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <37E3C6E4.90306F8@newsguy.com> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 02:07:48 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Stevenson Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cache-friendly scheduling for SMP References: <199909161225.MAA14962@jules.res.cmu.edu> <19990916143724.F17119@homer.louisville.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Keith Stevenson wrote: > > IBM just released a new version of AIX (4.3.3). One of the big features is > CPU affinity in order to made better use of the CPU caches. They claim to > have done this be having a separate run queue for each CPU. ? Are they recycling marketing statements now? They have had cpu affinity for ever! -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Thus, over the years my wife and I have physically diverged. While I have zoomed toward a crusty middle-age, she has instead clung doggedly to the sweet bloom of youth. Naturally I think this unfair. Yet, if it was the other way around, I confess I wouldn't be happy either." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message