From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 1 20:36:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3259B106566C for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:36:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5CC8FC17 for ; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 20:36:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan (a80-101-78-208.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.78.208]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p81KZnlc042461 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:35:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from yokozuna.lan (yokozuna.lan [IPv6:::1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p81KZn1M006453; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:35:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 22:35:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Beishuizen To: =?KOI8-R?B?68/O2MvP1yDl18fFzsnK?= In-Reply-To: <123778406.20110901225021@yandex.ru> Message-ID: References: <4E5E8A93.1010006@sentex.net> <123778406.20110901225021@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="394277907-1517634111-1314909349=:2952" X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mike Tancsa Subject: Re[2]: vpn using pptpclient in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 20:36:27 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --394277907-1517634111-1314909349=:2952 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, the wise =CA=EE=ED=FC=EA=EE=E2 =C5=E2=E3=E5=ED=E8=E9 wr= ote: > Notice: [B1] IFACE: Add route 0.0.0.0/0 130.115.3.34 failed: File exists > You already have default route in your system > why you set up the default again? > Notice in conf: > set iface route default With help from Mike Tancsa I've changed the config a bit and getting less= =20 errors now, but still not a working vpn connection. My mpd.conf is now: =2E.. # Default configuration is "pptp_client" default: =09load pptp_client pptp_client: # # PPTP client: only outgoing calls, auto reconnect, # ipcp-negotiated address, one-sided authentication, # default route points on ISP's end # =09create bundle static B1 =09set iface route 130.115.0.0/16 =09set ipcp ranges 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 =09set bundle enable compression =09set ccp yes mppc =09set mppc yes e40 =09set mppc yes e128 =09set bundle enable crypt-reqd =09set mppc yes stateless =09create link static L1 pptp =09set link action bundle B1 =09set auth authname xxxxxxxxxxxxxx =09set auth password xxxxxxxxxxxxx =09set link max-redial 0 =09set link mtu 1460 =09set link keep-alive 20 75 =09set pptp peer vpn-eur-pptp.eur.nl =09set pptp disable windowing =09open =2E.. It looks like it's setting up a correct connection, but the site of the=20 library I would like to access isn't accessible when mpd5 is running: =2E.. process 2965 started, version 5.5 (root@yokozuna.lan 17:08 30-Jul-2011) CONSOLE: listening on 127.0.0.1 5005 web: listening on 0.0.0.0 5006 [B1] Bundle: Interface ng0 created [L1] [L1] Link: OPEN event [L1] LCP: Open event [L1] LCP: state change Initial --> Starting [L1] LCP: LayerStart [L1] PPTP call successful [L1] Link: UP event [L1] LCP: Up event [L1] LCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #1 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 [L1] MRU 1500 [L1] MAGICNUM 0a9219e0 [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #2 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 [L1] MRU 1500 [L1] MAGICNUM 0a9219e0 [L1] LCP: rec'd Configure Reject #2 (Req-Sent) [L1] PROTOCOMP [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #3 [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 [L1] MRU 1500 [L1] MAGICNUM 0a9219e0 [L1] LCP: rec'd Configure Reject #3 (Req-Sent) [L1] ACFCOMP [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #4 [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 [L1] MRU 1500 [L1] MAGICNUM 0a9219e0 [L1] LCP: rec'd Configure Nak #4 (Req-Sent) [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 [L1] LCP: SendConfigReq #5 [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 [L1] MRU 1500 [L1] MAGICNUM 0a9219e0 [L1] LCP: rec'd Configure Ack #5 (Req-Sent) [L1] ACCMAP 0x000a0000 [L1] MRU 1500 [L1] MAGICNUM 0a9219e0 [L1] LCP: state change Req-Sent --> Ack-Rcvd [L1] LCP: rec'd Configure Request #1 (Ack-Rcvd) [L1] AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 [L1] LCP: SendConfigAck #1 [L1] AUTHPROTO CHAP MSOFTv2 [L1] LCP: state change Ack-Rcvd --> Opened [L1] LCP: auth: peer wants CHAP, I want nothing [L1] LCP: LayerUp [L1] CHAP: rec'd CHALLENGE #1 len: 21 [L1] Name: "" [L1] CHAP: Using authname "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" [L1] CHAP: sending RESPONSE #1 len: 69 [L1] CHAP: rec'd CHALLENGE #2 len: 21 [L1] Name: "" [L1] CHAP: Using authname "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" [L1] CHAP: sending RESPONSE #2 len: 69 [L1] rec'd proto IPCP during authenticate phase [L1] rec'd proto CCP during authenticate phase [L1] CHAP: sending RESPONSE #2 len: 69 [L1] CHAP: rec'd SUCCESS #2 len: 46 [L1] MESG: S=3DF1619D8A3373D2F43E6652E992CA564D66B1C1A4 [L1] LCP: authorization successful [L1] Link: Matched action 'bundle "B1" ""' [L1] Link: Join bundle "B1" [B1] Bundle: Status update: up 1 link, total bandwidth 64000 bps [B1] IPCP: Open event [B1] IPCP: state change Initial --> Starting [B1] IPCP: LayerStart [B1] CCP: Open event [B1] CCP: state change Initial --> Starting [B1] CCP: LayerStart [B1] IPCP: Up event [B1] IPCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent [B1] IPCP: SendConfigReq #1 [B1] IPADDR 0.0.0.0 [B1] COMPPROTO VJCOMP, 16 comp. channels, no comp-cid [B1] CCP: Up event [B1] CCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent [B1] CCP: SendConfigReq #1 [B1] MPPC [B1] 0x01000060:MPPE(40, 128 bits), stateless [B1] CCP: rec'd Configure Nak #1 (Req-Sent) [B1] MPPC [B1] 0x01000040:MPPE(128 bits), stateless [B1] CCP: SendConfigReq #2 [B1] MPPC [B1] 0x01000040:MPPE(128 bits), stateless [B1] CCP: rec'd Configure Ack #2 (Req-Sent) [B1] MPPC [B1] 0x01000040:MPPE(128 bits), stateless [B1] CCP: state change Req-Sent --> Ack-Rcvd [B1] IPCP: rec'd Configure Request #1 (Req-Sent) [B1] IPADDR 130.115.3.35 [B1] 130.115.3.35 is OK [B1] IPCP: SendConfigAck #1 [B1] IPADDR 130.115.3.35 [B1] IPCP: state change Req-Sent --> Ack-Sent [B1] CCP: rec'd Configure Request #1 (Ack-Rcvd) [B1] MPPC [B1] 0x01000060:MPPE(40, 128 bits), stateless [B1] CCP: SendConfigNak #1 [B1] MPPC [B1] 0x01000040:MPPE(128 bits), stateless [B1] CCP: rec'd Configure Request #2 (Ack-Rcvd) [B1] MPPC [B1] 0x01000040:MPPE(128 bits), stateless [B1] CCP: SendConfigAck #2 [B1] MPPC [B1] 0x01000040:MPPE(128 bits), stateless [B1] CCP: state change Ack-Rcvd --> Opened [B1] CCP: LayerUp [B1] CCP: Compress using: mppc (MPPE(128 bits), stateless) [B1] CCP: Decompress using: mppc (MPPE(128 bits), stateless) [B1] IPCP: SendConfigReq #2 [B1] IPADDR 0.0.0.0 [B1] COMPPROTO VJCOMP, 16 comp. channels, no comp-cid [B1] IPCP: rec'd Configure Reject #2 (Ack-Sent) [B1] COMPPROTO VJCOMP, 16 comp. channels, no comp-cid [B1] IPCP: SendConfigReq #3 [B1] IPADDR 0.0.0.0 [B1] IPCP: rec'd Configure Nak #3 (Ack-Sent) [B1] IPADDR 130.115.85.11 [B1] 130.115.85.11 is OK [B1] IPCP: SendConfigReq #4 [B1] IPADDR 130.115.85.11 [B1] IPCP: rec'd Configure Ack #4 (Ack-Sent) [B1] IPADDR 130.115.85.11 [B1] IPCP: state change Ack-Sent --> Opened [B1] IPCP: LayerUp [B1] 130.115.85.11 -> 130.115.3.35 [B1] IFACE: Up event =2E.. I also noticed some kernel messages when starting mpd5: =2E.. WARNING: attempt to domain_add(netgraph) after domainfinalize() Loop detected on ng0 Loop detected on ng0 Loop detected on ng0 =2E.. So I get the impression that I'm almost there. Marco --=20 Let me tell you who the actual "front-runners" are. On one side, you have George Bush, who is currently going through a sort of fraternity hazing wherein he has to perform a series of humiliating stunts to win the approva= l of the Republican Right. For example, they had him make a speech oozing praise all over William Loeb, deceased publisher of the Manchester (N.H.) Union Leader and Slime Journalist. Loeb had dumped viciously all over Geor= ge in the 1980 New Hampshire primary. But when the Right held a big tribute for Loeb, George came back to the fold, like a man with a bungee cord wrapp= ed around his neck. =09=09-- Dave Barry --394277907-1517634111-1314909349=:2952--