From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 21 13:10:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6858F37B401 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A6B43FDF for ; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:10:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h3LKA2TC041884; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 15:10:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 15:10:02 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Jesse Geddis Message-ID: <20030421201002.GH28595@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20030421191537.GG28595@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs filesystem size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:10:04 -0000 In the last episode (Apr 21), Jesse Geddis said: > Yes, it only appears to affect the reporting and not the actual > reading/writing to the filesystem. Is there an adjustment I can make > to correct it? Thanks again =) I was working on a fix when my filesystem df stats suddenly reverted back to normal, so I lost my test case :) If you're willing to do some kernel rebuilding, start adding printfs inside nfs_statfs and related functions, and determine exactly where the sign change occurs. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com