From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 8 02:14:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6809916A4DA for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 02:14:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B395543D46 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 02:14:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k782E7iQ095244 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:14:37 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.3/8.12.11) id k782E5D1094819; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:14:05 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:14:05 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200608080214.k782E5D1094819@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: nagylzs@enternet.hu In-reply-to: <44D79242.3050108@enternet.hu> (message from =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Nagy_L=E1szl=F3?= on Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:19:30 +0200) References: <44D79242.3050108@enternet.hu> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thin terminals for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 02:14:45 -0000 > - Is there a more cost-effective solution? (Something that I did not > think of) We used to build (well my colleague did that) X terminals based on a thin configuration of freeBSD (must have been version 2 at that time) that we ran on diskless computers booting from floppy. At that time we ran it on pentium 100 MHz, with something between 16 and 32 MB RAM, over a 10 MB shared Ethernet. All applications ran on the cental server, and X terminals were just that: display devices. It was a bit slow, you could not look at a video, but otherwise it worked. Of course you need more horse power on the server, but if you have a set of old PC with similar video adapters, that's an easy solution to deploy once one machine is up. Olivier