From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Sep  2 00:06:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id AAA18302
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 2 Sep 1996 00:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA18297
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 1996 00:06:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id AAA02922; Mon, 2 Sep 1996 00:06:17 -0700 (PDT)
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users),
        bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans)
Subject: Re: Anyone mind if I remove the following braindamage from test(1)? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Sep 1996 08:31:48 +0200."
             <199609020631.IAA22016@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 1996 00:06:17 -0700
Message-ID: <2920.841647977@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Also,

>      1 argument:                                                            1
> 
>           Exit true (0) if $1 is not null; otherwise, exit false.           1

I'd expect that to hold true only if the argument was not a flag
argument which required a parameter, then I'd expect it to puke.  This
would also help to quickly find instances where you'd undefined a
necessary variable in the source tree, instead of giving a cryptic
error message like:  ``usage: rm [-f | -i] [-dPRr] file ...''

					Jordan