From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Nov 24 11:12:54 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA06390
          for current-outgoing; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 11:12:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA06385;
          Sun, 24 Nov 1996 11:12:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.2/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA02964; Sun, 24 Nov 1996 11:05:55 -0800 (PST)
To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch)
cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users), phk@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: 2.2-ALPHA install failure 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 24 Nov 1996 12:31:15 +0100."
             <199611241131.MAA10948@uriah.heep.sax.de> 
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 1996 11:05:55 -0800
Message-ID: <2962.848862355@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> X/64/32 is okay.  Basically, Jordan, the entire message is a big
> bogosity at all.  I've always been annoyed by it.  Why not leave it
> alone in the DD case?  (NB: i _don't_ advocate for the latter change
> for 2.2, but for 3.0-current.)

Or we could get Poul-Henning to DTRT with libdisk - that would
be a concept, and even the correct place to handle it. :-)

					Jordan