From owner-freebsd-advocacy  Wed Jun  2 13:37:17 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C8814E0B
	for <freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed,  2 Jun 1999 13:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id WAA26081;
	Wed, 2 Jun 1999 22:37:08 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: "Scott I. Remick" <scott@computeralt.com>
Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD on c|Net
References: <4.2.0.54.19990527105332.036ed880@mail.computeralt.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 02 Jun 1999 22:37:07 +0200
In-Reply-To: "Scott I. Remick"'s message of "Thu, 27 May 1999 10:54:30 -0400"
Message-ID: <xzp3e0a49vw.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"Scott I. Remick" <scott@computeralt.com> writes:
> c|Net just did a review on alternatives to Windoze, and FreeBSD 3.2 was one 
> of the OSes reviewed.... yay!
> 
> <http://home.cnet.com/category/0-3709-7-284910.html>

Old stuff. Never mind the date on the front page. Search the list
archives if you don't believe me.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message