From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 08:18:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C951065677 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1818FC1C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so5261839pbb.13 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:18:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LFpFP5BOVQI9b05v9LYJabrUKYg/VlF6T7N/cgo7zUw=; b=gkaaeI9R4ojq960haOxONfXE95l/D+8A6vbvy+LSanLTK7H27PLEaO5m44ozozatSt CbQoJVUM28ioX+xyizYZtVfsGCWnI1mnMnZOIn1uq4tHEHMkRxEPxjEIoOtv5vJqnJnU V8ZMbjmJ4Ygru7eA6BuMC1kxthFSLudL0NkI2aq5UGg8vVXB3DguxFTfA1BH289QuW4B h1s17maDHlvu4/93RKf60tVKOh5v2OfKtJg+vv3VEtT35K+wBIZiKWFgH936o4chBZxx /r8TqM2FKjk+73gTuGNlHq0C4DEnRlT6+jG7ZoKAzBvbW50Mg+lwKQV2MkcTVk9VDDL+ kZdw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.135.201 with SMTP id pu9mr16212315pbb.146.1339748308345; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.143.91.18 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:18:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FDAEF5E.7090305@my.gd> References: <4FD9A0E2.9010101@my.gd> <20120614144128.GB26121@lonesome.com> <96D1E708-FBBE-4E7F-B70A-4AA48EFD3268@my.gd> <4FDAEF5E.7090305@my.gd> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:18:28 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2Xx4VIRQIchSihmsQNfYgpM-PEE Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Damien Fleuriot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Mark Linimon , "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Upcoming release schedule - 8.4 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 08:18:29 -0000 10.x will likely be more stable if 9.x gets stressed, and the bugs from there get fixed in -HEAD. I know this goes against what users expect, but as a software developer, QA is only as good as your testing and validation procedures. :) Adrian