Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:18:28 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Upcoming release schedule - 8.4 ? Message-ID: <CAJ-VmomHpB-2GDVw3yKa9xR3hf_TBwcJj4qgdBt0jfEtYewNZg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FDAEF5E.7090305@my.gd> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206111537310.19012@kozubik.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206140649530.72545@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CADLo83--6KyBptR2a4GgEy_CEW3trKxHT1k9ZzMu8P44cH5O2A@mail.gmail.com> <4FD9A0E2.9010101@my.gd> <20120614144128.GB26121@lonesome.com> <96D1E708-FBBE-4E7F-B70A-4AA48EFD3268@my.gd> <CAJ-VmonEen4WR6ekXK3q-TSR%2BbiyzWKzi-EGyOyJ5=Sp63taSA@mail.gmail.com> <4FDAEF5E.7090305@my.gd>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
10.x will likely be more stable if 9.x gets stressed, and the bugs from there get fixed in -HEAD. I know this goes against what users expect, but as a software developer, QA is only as good as your testing and validation procedures. :) Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmomHpB-2GDVw3yKa9xR3hf_TBwcJj4qgdBt0jfEtYewNZg>